Evil Avatar  




Go Back   Evil Avatar > Daily Gaming News > News Items

» Sponsored Links


» Recent Threads
Total War: Rome II ...
Last post by Apex
Today 01:43 AM
2 Replies, 405 Views
State of Decay: Year-One...
Last post by mundanematt
Today 12:31 AM
2 Replies, 228 Views
Weekend Gamer: What are...
Last post by brandonjclark
Yesterday 10:56 PM
20 Replies, 658 Views
Gaming Laptop Help
Last post by AzSinistar
Yesterday 10:52 PM
7 Replies, 276 Views
Shadow of Mordor -...
Last post by brandonjclark
Yesterday 10:20 PM
2 Replies, 396 Views
Nintendo's New 3DS?
Last post by Agnostic Pope
Yesterday 09:09 PM
26 Replies, 942 Views
Nintendo of Europe...
Last post by Terran
Yesterday 08:28 PM
3 Replies, 490 Views
Saints Row IV: Gat Out...
Last post by karaliusbronius
Yesterday 07:17 PM
8 Replies, 660 Views
» Promotion


Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old 04-30-2012, 10:08 AM   #21
MrE
Low Attention Span
 
MrE's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: San Jose, CA
Posts: 1,280
I just upgraded to a single GTX680, and its plenty fast on my 30" at 2560x1600 and secondary 27" monitor.

A thousand bucks for a graphics card is nuts! But I'm willing to bet there will be various "special edition" versions that will run even more. Meh, I gave up caring about having the fastest *fill in the blank* years ago.
MrE is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-30-2012, 10:10 AM   #22
Rommel
International Playboy
 
Rommel's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Hong Kong
Posts: 6,419
Quote:
Originally Posted by Syl View Post
Less power, heat, space? I thought that was pretty obvious.
The 680s are already well regarded for not being power hog solar flares. If anything, this card is more likely to burn the house down, as evidenced by the need to reduce its clock speed. Space I will grant you--except as Emabulator said, no one is buying $1000 of video card and going cheap on the motherboard. Baffling.
Rommel is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-30-2012, 04:52 PM   #23
Syl
Evil Dead
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Corvallis, OR
Posts: 6,311
Blog Entries: 1
Quote:
Originally Posted by Rommel View Post
The 680s are already well regarded for not being power hog solar flares. If anything, this card is more likely to burn the house down, as evidenced by the need to reduce its clock speed. Space I will grant you--except as Emabulator said, no one is buying $1000 of video card and going cheap on the motherboard. Baffling.
The need to reduce the clock speed is somewhat superficial. It's still far less power than dual 680's in SLI. Likewise this card is doing the same thing that the 6990 did and allowing an absolutely massive voltage hike for overclocking.
Syl is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Tags
gtx 690, nvidia

Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -7. The time now is 03:19 AM.