Evil Avatar  




Go Back   Evil Avatar > Daily Gaming News > News Items

» Our Partners


» Recent Threads
Netflix Plans to Bring...
Last post by brandonjclark
Today 08:57 AM
7 Replies, 208 Views
Future Dante's Inferno...
Last post by Venkman
Today 08:50 AM
5 Replies, 186 Views
Get Your Free Armor and...
Last post by Jadbalja
Today 08:46 AM
31 Replies, 1,596 Views
Ghost Recon: Future...
Last post by Spacebear
Today 08:46 AM
11 Replies, 424 Views
Possible Prothean...
Last post by brandonjclark
Today 08:36 AM
14 Replies, 678 Views
Diablo III Gets More...
Last post by brandonjclark
Today 08:34 AM
3 Replies, 160 Views
Red Dead Redemption...
Last post by Silverbaine
Today 08:23 AM
5 Replies, 290 Views
Game Informer Doesn't...
Last post by lockwoodx
Today 08:05 AM
37 Replies, 2,502 Views
» Ads by Google


Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old 11-01-2009, 09:15 AM   #61
benig
Soul Reaper
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Posts: 243
Quote:
Originally Posted by Zeal View Post
anyone that can't tell a differnece between 30fps and 60fps is either retarded, blind, or still playing on a standard definition pos.
The question isn't "can you tell the difference", because side-by-side, you can tell the difference. It's not necessarily a difference you can quantify. The question is whether one is better than the other, and the and the
answer is that no, the difference in video refresh rate does not mean the game is smoother to play.
You need to throw out what you 'know' about FPS. We're not talking about PC games, where your framerate is rarely locked and the difference between 60 and 30 is very noticeable because small shifts in the framerate can mean missing a frame, and having to wait an entire cycle before you get to update the screen. Also, poorly programmed games, that lock sim-cycles to render-cycles don't count, that's just a bad game.
A properly-programmed game which sims at a high rate (60 per second if it does ya) and renders at 30 FPS (And NEVER misses a frame. A lot of the hiccups you associate with framerate are the game missing a frame update once in awhile) is ideal to a game running at 60 fps, and virtually indistinguishable.
You then free up an entire extra frame worth for things like post-effects, better AI, more characters on the screen, higher poly models, and anything else you'd conceivably want in your game. The only reason any game nowadays runs at 60 fps is purely for marketing reasons and not for gameplay, because internet kids get a huge boner for it.
__________________
Bid on my stuff!
benig is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-03-2009, 04:06 PM   #62
blackzc
Has probably been drinkin
 
blackzc's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Bios updates rule the planet
Posts: 1,659
Its pretty easy to tell the difference between 30-60. I dont care what any book,post or anti elitist tells me. 60 + is a different story. So why not just make the F-ing game run 60 fps and stop with the framerate doesn't matter crap. Make it really not matter.

Its so ghetto to pile so much crap on the processor it cant function cleanly.
__________________
Long Live The Magic PC!
blackzc is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-05-2009, 09:45 AM   #63
Ozymandias
Developer
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Seattle, WA
Posts: 409
Quote:
Originally Posted by Jotoco View Post
I can't get within a hundred yards of the living room's TV without noticing the glaring difference that 120Hz (FPS) makes over 30 or 60Hz (FPS).
You have a freaking huge house.
Ozymandias is online now   Reply With Quote
Reply

Tags
ratchet & clank future

Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


Play blackjack at an award winning casino and test your latest strategy today.


All times are GMT -7. The time now is 08:59 AM.