Evil Avatar

Evil Avatar (http://www.evilavatar.com/forums/index.php)
-   News Items (http://www.evilavatar.com/forums/forumdisplay.php?f=2)
-   -   Call of Duty: Ghosts Single Player Campaign Trailer (http://www.evilavatar.com/forums/showthread.php?t=198020)

Emabulator 09-10-2013 11:56 AM

Call of Duty: Ghosts Single Player Campaign Trailer
 

Quote:

Call of Duty: Ghosts takes the critically-acclaimed franchise into the next generation. New world. New story. New, next-gen engine.
Click on the headline to watch the trailer.

Emabulator 09-10-2013 11:56 AM


Suicidal ShiZuru 09-10-2013 12:16 PM


SaintBlitzkrieg 09-10-2013 12:18 PM

The dog taking out the helicopter... ridiculous. This game officially has gone full Sharknado.

Karai Pantsu 09-10-2013 12:51 PM

I thought the idea of space guns implied by that image was bad enough to claim the shark jumped. Using a regular old earth gun in space would be a bad enough idea on its own, and then you add in the rest of the nonsense.

Apex 09-10-2013 12:56 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by SaintBlitzkrieg (Post 2244452)
... full Sharknado.

This is now an acceptable way to describe things. I will be using it on any suitable occasion.

Fizzl 09-10-2013 01:13 PM

Put it to Hellmarch and it could be advertising a new Red Alert!

Franjo 09-10-2013 01:15 PM

What is this garbage? Still proud to say I haven't touch COD franchise since the first Modern Warfare. Don't know what I just watched

BytorUK 09-10-2013 01:48 PM

So we now know that it will be next year before we get a truly next gen title because that looks like scaled down , average 360/ps3 graphics. Not even a match for the latest Tomb raider game.

Why buy a new console for the next 12 months if this is the quality we can expect whilst the transistion from new to old takes place

SaintBlitzkrieg 09-10-2013 01:58 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Apex (Post 2244470)
This is now an acceptable way to describe things. I will be using it on any suitable occasion.

Your welcome. That movie was ridiculous, and so was that scene, so it just worked out.

Evil Avatar 09-10-2013 05:46 PM

I think this game has officially Jumped the Sharknado.

bean19 09-10-2013 06:08 PM

I think it looks really cool to be honest.

Larnek 09-10-2013 06:46 PM

It would be so awesome to have guns in space.. Feel the tension! You get one shot, don't fuck it up because you're gonna be launched.

OmegaVader 09-10-2013 08:11 PM

If Call of Duty was the James Bond franchise, then it's clearly entered the Roger Moore era. That opening scene had Moonraker written all over it.

BeachGaara 09-10-2013 08:38 PM

...Jesus Chist.

Phoenix1985 09-10-2013 10:32 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by OmegaVader (Post 2244557)
If Call of Duty was the James Bond franchise, then it's clearly entered the Roger Moore era. That opening scene had Moonraker written all over it.

A gun with a muzzle flare being fired in high atmosphere or beyond. WOO! That will certainly work and be a nice long scene!

BytorUK 09-11-2013 01:19 AM

Muzzle flare , zero gravity , realism .....

Who cares as long as its fun !

I for one am looking forward to this .

Evil Avatar 09-11-2013 01:49 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by OmegaVader (Post 2244557)
If Call of Duty was the James Bond franchise, then it's clearly entered the Roger Moore era. That opening scene had Moonraker written all over it.

The Moonraker stuff looked like the most fun, it was a shame to see it get grounded back to earth in the rest of the trailer.

Karai Pantsu 09-11-2013 08:44 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Phoenix1985 (Post 2244584)
A gun with a muzzle flare being fired in high atmosphere or beyond. WOO! That will certainly work and be a nice long scene!

Considering most gunpowder mixes have their own oxidizers, that would actually happen. But it's still stupid, because physics dictates that unless you lock yourself into the structure, firing a gun in space would almost instantly catapult you off said structure, or at the very least into another chunk of it, damaging you or your suit.

Guns developed for space would be more shotgun like, because the aim is merely to damage the suit, not the person inside it, because a damaged suit means death in space. That'd mean low-power high-spread ammunition that would not damage the delicate structures of space installations, but would be enough to punch a hole in a person's space suit or helmet. I suppose you could use the angle "this is the future" to call that the truth, and those guns in the video were all developed specifically for micro gravity use. It's still silly, though.

bean19 09-11-2013 09:12 AM

Accodring to Dr. L. Nelson of Bishop University c/o Slate.com.

Quote:

In zero gravity, on the other hand, even the smallest recoil would send you backwards. In most cases this would be very manageable, however, bouncing you back at a speed of less than one meter per second, so you wouldn’t have to worry about seriously injuring yourself. Even if you fired a .44 Magnum, for example, and weighed only 100 pounds, the recoil velocity would be under 0.5 mph, which is still less than walking speed. If you wanted to really propel yourself using a gun, you’d want to use a really big one.
So they would push guys back ever-so slightly, but still enough to pull you out of cover. This COULD be compensated for by a jetpack and a smart program could be used to tell the suit to hold your position while you are firing if you are firing from cover, or you could latch a hip belt (or a leg) and translate the force to your cover (which might be enough in zero G to give it some rotation which would be interesting).

Anyway, I watched the video again and I only saw one astronaut firing and he was close enough to cover to be latched on to something.


All times are GMT -7. The time now is 03:20 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2014, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.