PDA

View Full Version : Medieval 2: Total War Q&A


Chill
01-21-2006, 10:42 AM
IGN (http://www.ign.com) has a small interview (http://pc.ign.com/articles/682/682437p1.html) up with Project Director for Creative Assembly, Bob Smith. Along with some new screenshots.

Bob Smith: The whole Medieval period was one giant arms race really. At the start, everyone has simple bows, and wears mail armour. As time goes the development of the longbow, crossbow and steel crossbow drive the adoption of heavier and heavier armour, culminating in the full suit of plate. At the same time, this drives the adoption of bigger heavier axes, halberds and other pole weapons for melee. Finally at the end of the period, the introduction of guns lead to a reduction in armour, as mobility is a better defense.

In siege warfare, as the game progresses, the attackers will develop trebuchets and progressively bigger and better cannon. The defender can counter by developing bigger fortresses with two or three rings of walls. An attacker with a good train of artillery will always be able to blast a hole in the outer wall, but if the assault on the breach is too costly, they might not have the strength to take the second or third ring.
I'm glad they're making the seiges more exciting, as the seiges in R:TW can get very monotonous by the end of a long campaign.

goc_sin
01-21-2006, 11:56 AM
I can't wait to play this... Has there been any mention on when the release date is? I'm hoping for a '06 release.

Jetherik
01-21-2006, 12:01 PM
Very cool. M:TW was my least favorite of the bunch. I was very disappointed in the management details that were fixed in Rome. And building upon Rome, this should be great.

player66
01-21-2006, 12:11 PM
I never played this series. Is it similar to Rome: Total War?

Nesta
01-21-2006, 12:50 PM
I never played this series. Is it similar to Rome: Total War?

Yeah, it's the game prior to Rome in the Total War series and it was damn good. It was Europe in the Medieval times during the crusades and it kicked farkin ass.

baz
01-21-2006, 12:56 PM
Why wouldn't you ask them why they are doing a sequel rather than hitting up a new time period. I mean I can understand the attraction of the medieval era, but I like to know why they didn't hit up something new. Freaking interviews suck 99% of the time.

Cool AN
01-21-2006, 02:57 PM
Sounds good, I really enjoyed R:TW so I will probably pick this up.

Abash Alarmist
01-21-2006, 03:06 PM
They did say why they didn't want to go to a new era. They said that they have a fascination with with Medieval era (which they should), and that is good enough for me. If they are that devoted to that specific time period, why should we bitch? It will be a great game, and it will have the love and dedication that only a company like that would take advantage of.

mos
01-21-2006, 06:25 PM
When Rome came out, I felt a twinge of disappointment: this was a stellar update to the TW engine, and I felt it was too bad they had already done the Medieval time period. It's just the most interesting era, IMHO, and I wished they had waited for this new technology. I thought it was a very long shot that they'd do a sequel.