PDA

View Full Version : IGN Gives Dawn of War II a Score of 9.0/10


Emabulator
02-18-2009, 03:20 PM
The reviews of Relic's action-RPG/RTS, Warhammer 40,000: Dawn of War II, have trickled out rather than coming in a flood like we usually see when the publisher's embargo is lifted. With the game due out tomorrow I thought some of you might like to take a look at one of the few full length reviews currently available online. This time around it received an overall score of 9.0/10 from IGN (http://pc.ign.com/articles/954/954749p1.html).

Relic has made a lot of bold decisions with Warhammer 40,000: Dawn of War II, some of which are sure to turn off parts of the RTS hardcore base, the most obvious being the elimination of base building. Yet as players we can't continue to accept the same kinds of games, complain about stagnation, and then turn our backs when somebody does something different. In the campaign portion of the game Relic blended elements of action-RPGs and real-time strategy games and succeeded in producing a new and entertaining kind of experience. The missions could be more interesting and quality of narrative delivery stronger, but what's here is a terrific alternative to the standard base-bashing real-time strategy campaigns, hopefully something Relic is able to expand and further improve with expansions. A full multiplayer suite and four playable races are there waiting for you when you're through with the campaign, and should provide lots of fast-paced bouts of brutal conflict online and in skirmishes against the AI. While the overall formula could still use some fine-tuning, the current product is one part hypercharged tactical combat, one part streamlined competitive RTS, and entirely worth playing.

BloodPack
02-18-2009, 03:31 PM
I am not really enjoying the beta all that much, but at the same time I am dying for a RTS game, and I can't wait for Starcraft II so I will probably buy DOWII.

Wyrm
02-18-2009, 04:28 PM
I bought parts to fix my computer for this game! I can't wait.

Rambilin
02-18-2009, 07:44 PM
Can't wait. I have Steam downloading/installing it now. I wish it was at the normal 500kb/s rather than the 200kb/s I'm getting right now.

Bruss25
02-18-2009, 08:06 PM
I'm getting 700kb off steam right now.

Sarconix
02-18-2009, 09:21 PM
Good for Relic. Nice to hear some good things about the SP campaign, since that was absent in the (MP) beta. Now to upgrade my machine for this beast...

schmunkel98
02-19-2009, 05:56 AM
I am not impressed with this game so far in the beta when it comes to multiplayer. The matchmaking system is horrible. Having to deal with Games for Windows Live sucks. I guess I'm a bit spoiled by Blizzard's Battlenet system and expect something of that nature with an online RTS. The gameplay does not really seem all that varied once you figure out how to defend positions. I really hate the lack of base building of any kind. I'm also waiting for Starcraft 2 to come out, but was willing to give this one a shot in the meantime. I'm going to have to pass on it based on what I have seen so far. This one looks like a brief amount of fun, but nothing to keep me playing for hours on end like I know Starcraft 2 will.

Chimpbot
02-19-2009, 06:42 AM
This review is really verbose; he could have just summed the entire game up in one sentence.

DoW2 is basically a pretty damn accurate portrayal of the tabeltop game.

It basically takes the tabletop wargame, which was all about strategy and unit control without the base-building, and makes it's real-time. Combined with this is the unit progression which sounds almost exactly like it is with the original game. It sounds fucking badass and I'm a sad panda due to the fact that I'll have to spend more money on yet another game this week. Damnit to hell.


I'm assuming the Steam version uses it's own matchmaking on this. Does it also have to go through GFWL? If so, I'll just buy a boxed copy. This is one of those times where I'd rather own the box for some reason.

HarverdGrad
02-19-2009, 02:52 PM
..If so, I'll just buy a boxed copy. This is one of those times where I'd rather own the box for some reason.

..so said the Gamestop Manager ;)

JamieSI
02-20-2009, 01:25 AM
Many reviews are starting to come in for THQ's RTS sequel, Dawn of War II. Strategy Informer (http://www.strategyinformer.com/pc/warhammer40000dawnofwarii/review.html) has published its review, praising THQ for dropping the standard base building RTS scene, giving the game a score of 9.3/10.

Much has changed since the days of just sending waves upon waves of squads to their noble deaths in the vain hope they’ll break the defensive lines of your enemies base. Relic take a page from one of their other hot RTS creations – Company of Heroes – with Dawn of War II playing huge emphasis on the squads themselves, with each feeling critical to success. To this end maps are littered with cover spots everywhere bringing the intensity of battles to new highs as you literally throw everything you have to gun, grenade and charge your way through. To help keep the relentless tug of war going on the fields of battle, units are better equipped with talents and abilities which don’t feel over bearing or cheaply tacked on; in a tight spot they can turn the tide quickly.

More can be seen here (http://www.strategyinformer.com/pc/warhammer40000dawnofwarii/review.html).