PDA

View Full Version : Devil May Cry 4 TGS 2K5 Trailer


H.Bogard
09-18-2005, 04:58 AM
Turned up at the bottom of my Google search :

unlike that of what we saw at E3, this looks good, very legit. The graphics are above par, and well I look forward to demon slaying in next gen.
Devil May Cry 4 TGS 2K5 Trailer (http://www.unlimitedgamer.net/media/dmc4_tgs05_trailer_short_quick.mov)

Credits to Unlimited Gamer (http://www.unlimitedgamer.net/16/devil-may-cry-4-tgs-trailer/)

NELS
09-18-2005, 05:50 AM
I love me some Dante!

Looks good real good.

bumgut
09-18-2005, 08:07 AM
Just bought a PS2 and finished DMC3. Great game. Will prob get a PS3 now: It will have the God of War, DMC3 and Onimusha 3 sequels!!

pomeroy
09-18-2005, 09:06 AM
Oh Boy! Sequels!

EvilBob46
09-18-2005, 09:29 AM
Just bought a PS2 and finished DMC3.

That game was far too easy though.

...j/k. THAT GAME WAS F___ING HARD DAMNIT! ARGHABAWHA! Too f-ing hard IMO.

Triprotic
09-18-2005, 11:20 AM
looks like pre alpha footage... nothing to see here, move along.

Stryfe01
09-18-2005, 05:35 PM
I love me some Dante!

Looks good real good.

there was no gameplay footage...looks like nothing special yet.

Zeal
09-18-2005, 06:18 PM
This is what I don't understand. Microsoft was the only company to show actual games, yet Nintendo and Sony fans hype the heck outta everything.

Nintendo has yet to show a single Revolution title and Nintendo heads are already declaring a "revolution".

I hate fanboyism.

Venkman
09-18-2005, 08:52 PM
This is what I don't understand. Microsoft was the only company to show actual games, yet Nintendo and Sony fans hype the heck outta everything.


The hype will die down pretty quick if Sony announces a price around $500, without a hard drive. Of course they did this before, with the Playstation 1- everyone thought it was going to be super expensive, and they came in at $299, which was $100 LESS than the brand new Sega Saturn.



Nintendo has yet to show a single Revolution title and Nintendo heads are already declaring a "revolution".

I hate fanboyism.

And yet, I am most intrigued by this system. The idea of more involving interactivity interests me just as much as the 2 graphical beasts. I think Nintendo just did one awesome job of setting themselves apart in a good way.

thecrazyd
09-18-2005, 10:41 PM
This is what I don't understand. Microsoft was the only company to show actual games, yet Nintendo and Sony fans hype the heck outta everything.

Nintendo has yet to show a single Revolution title and Nintendo heads are already declaring a "revolution".

I hate fanboyism.
Maybe it is because everything MS has shown has been underwhelming, to say the least.

Spiffae
09-19-2005, 12:53 AM
Maybe it is because everything MS has shown has been underwhelming, to say the least.

Quoted for emphasis. I was at TGS, and while Dead Rising was cool, and a couple other games felt "next gen" I left feeling disappointed about the Xbox 360. There's nothing new here, just an Xbox with more power and HD graphics. The games are still the usual spread of good, bad, and really bad (Test Drive Unlimited, in it's current state)

RMan
09-19-2005, 08:15 AM
Nintendo has yet to show a single Revolution title and Nintendo heads are already declaring a "revolution".
Honestly, who cares if they’ve shown “actual” games for any of the systems. We know they’ll look much better, but there are a large number of people that know that will not change their experience. For me, HDTV is nice and improves the TV/Movie watching experience, but it doesn’t change it and it’s hardly worth getting excited about. They don’t have to show me “real” games on any of the systems, I already know they’ll look better, and although I care, I care a whole lot less than what Nintendo’s showing because it actually has tremendous potential to change my gaming experience.

Unless the 360 games do something really unexpected, even when it’s out and I can play games on it, I’ll still be more excited about the Revolution without any “real” games because what it’s capable of is so wildly superior to my gaming experience than what ANY graphics increase can deliver. So, even if they’re producing photorealistic games, that’s just not interesting enough for me to trump what the Revolution can deliver (but I’m demanding that way). And that doesn’t make me a fanboy, if Sony or MS had done something similar to satisfy me then they’d be getting my love right now, but they didn’t.

EGO
09-19-2005, 01:41 PM
I think people don't understand what a REAL next gen game looks like, which is why they say a REAL game is "underwhelming".

This pre-rendered BULLSHIT is blinding you to ACTUAL GAMEPLAY FOOTAGE.

Stop being fanbois, pull your head out of your arse and accept that "next gen" is like "current gen" but prettier, for the next couple of years!

And DMC4 is more of that pre-rendered bullshit.

TheBigL
09-19-2005, 01:45 PM
lame movie... how about posting some real gamplay, ha? sony?

Magnanimous Gnome
09-19-2005, 01:47 PM
Except a lot of the "next-gen" games HAVEN'T been all that prettier. Only a few of the Xbox 360 demos actually looked like they were a ways beyond what the current systems can do. I have yet to see a single demo that has made me go "wow!"

EGO
09-19-2005, 01:56 PM
Except a lot of the "next-gen" games HAVEN'T been all that prettier. Only a few of the Xbox 360 demos actually looked like they were a ways beyond what the current systems can do. I have yet to see a single demo that has made me go "wow!"

That's my point! Everyone gets all wet over these pre-rendered movies that were done by TV/movie trailer places and then when they see the REALITY of "next gen", they're "not impressed".

This shift to next gen is premature, like the advent of 3DO (the machine, not the software company), the 32x, Saturn, Dreamcast and other platforms that launched before there sufficient support and the previous platform had been fully exploited.