PDA

View Full Version : Chinese gamer sentenced to life


XenonCJ
06-08-2005, 08:39 AM
A Shanghai online gamer has been given a suspended death sentence for killing a fellow gamer.Qui Chengwei stabbed Zhu Caoyuan in the chest when he found out he had sold his virtual sword for 7,200 Yuan (£473).

The sword, which Mr Qui had lent to Mr Zhu, was won in the popular online game Legend of Mir 3.

Attempts to take the dispute to the police failed because there is currently no law in China to protect virtual property. BBC Source (http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/technology/4072704.stm)

bapenguin
06-08-2005, 08:47 AM
"We want Qui to die, and immediately,"

Short and to the point. No beating around the bush for them.

DCJoeDog
06-08-2005, 08:49 AM
Well, I wouldn't have sold the sword on pricipal alone, but jesus that other dude is just psycho for slicing the first guy up. Some folks just take online gaming a wee bit too seriously.

kickmybum
06-08-2005, 08:50 AM
Well, he was probably upset that he didn't get a cut of the money.

NACIONAL
06-08-2005, 08:53 AM
In this case, Mr Zhu did offer to hand over the cash but Mr Qui lost patience and stabbed him with "great force" according to media reports.

The man has VERY LOW patience....

XxSATANxX
06-08-2005, 09:12 AM
"While China has no laws to deal with the theft of virtual property, South Korea has a section of its police force that investigates in-game crime."

Holy shit who do you have to piss off to get stuck with that job.

DCJoeDog
06-08-2005, 09:15 AM
I'd take that job in a heart-beat

Derwin
06-08-2005, 09:16 AM
You have to piss off the people in Korea who get blowjobs for being good at Starcraft.

TrackZero
06-08-2005, 09:38 AM
You have to piss off the people in Korea who get blowjobs for being good at Starcraft.

Are they still into Starcraft? I thought that was over years ago.

Though with the popularity of the game, I'm still shocked Blizzard never got off their ass for Starcraft 2, since there obviously is a market for it who are patiently awaiting their sequel.

PacerDawn
06-08-2005, 09:40 AM
Related post (from back when it first happened) just for reference:

http://www.evilavatar.com/forums/showthread.php?t=1131

Quoted above, but I love this:

South Korea has a section of its police force that investigates in-game crime.
Best not ninja loot in Korea or you could wind up with 10 to life...

Bushido
06-08-2005, 09:59 AM
Anyone ever seen that movie Avalon?

Mac
06-08-2005, 10:15 AM
Bad roll of the dice.

Demize99
06-08-2005, 10:52 AM
Someone missed their saving throw.

koobz
06-08-2005, 11:27 AM
Wonder how much XP he got for that kill....

Heretic Machine
06-08-2005, 11:32 AM
Hey, selling some valuable online property can be the equivalent to an HDTV, or even a new computer. You better believe that if someone tried to screw with my PC, they're going down -hard-.

But the first guy should of never lent the sword out if it meant that much to him.

netcraazzy
06-08-2005, 12:15 PM
I don't know which is worse, the fact that somebody killed another person over an item in a game or the fact that somebody actually paid $400 for a freaking sword in an RPG.

Crabby
06-08-2005, 12:31 PM
I don't know which is worse, the fact that somebody killed another person over an item in a game or the fact that somebody actually paid $400 for a freaking sword in an RPG.

As a rule of thumb I would probably say the act that involved wiping another human from the face of this planet over the financial transaction.

Mrbunchypants
06-08-2005, 12:51 PM
Just wait soon this will happen to us in North america.
the last thing i want is to have jonny law ride up in Wow and smack me down for being a ninja. :mad:

ElectricMonk
06-08-2005, 01:07 PM
So... if there were laws that made virtual property the property of gamers would that mean gamers could hold blizzard & co responsible? no wonder those companies are so quick to stress how physically nonexistent these items are in cases like these.

51|RandoM
06-08-2005, 02:22 PM
Virtual possessions can have just as much value as physical possessions.

The game had nothing to do with this, it was punishment for a theft, pure and simple.

If the guy had done the same thing with an equally as hard to obtain object from real life, he probably would've got stabbed too, don't you think?

Derwin
06-08-2005, 02:22 PM
I wonder if the body dropped Phat Lewt.

51|RandoM
06-08-2005, 02:23 PM
So... if there were laws that made virtual property the property of gamers would that mean gamers could hold blizzard & co responsible? no wonder those companies are so quick to stress how physically nonexistent these items are in cases like these.


You don't own the objects in WoW, so people can't steal them from you.

:-)

Heretic Machine
06-08-2005, 02:25 PM
As a rule of thumb I would probably say the act that involved wiping another human from the face of this planet over the financial transaction.

The fucker got what he deserved, and I hope he's being eaten by all the little underground critters right now.

Mac
06-08-2005, 03:06 PM
The fucker got what he deserved, and I hope he's being eaten by all the little underground critters right now.

Whoa..what? He deserved a quick and untimely death because he sold 400 dollars worth of virtual property?

ElectricMonk
06-08-2005, 04:29 PM
you know, they should have an option to lease weapons like this in the game.

that way gamer a could lend gamer b his legendary dragon sword and know that it'll be automatically returned in a month etc.

i'm not sure if virtual property should be considered as real, but i do figure laws should be setup to enforce this sort of thing. having no laws at all is just inviting people to take advantage of the situtation

Heretic Machine
06-08-2005, 06:25 PM
Whoa..what? He deserved a quick and untimely death because he sold 400 dollars worth of virtual property?

Yes, he sold his friend's prized possession, for this he deserved to die horribly.

XenonCJ
06-08-2005, 06:42 PM
Yes, he sold his friend's prized possession, for this he deserved to die horribly.Heh ok... Have you ever heard of making the punishment fit the crime?

How about make the guy who sold it get him another sword? Or pay him 2x the value he sold it for?

It's not like he sold his Great-Grandfather's wrist watch...

Killing him, is uh, over kill....

mister_slim
06-08-2005, 07:21 PM
Though with the popularity of the game, I'm still shocked Blizzard never got off their ass for Starcraft 2, since there obviously is a market for it who are patiently awaiting their sequel.
I think the Battle Chest is still selling pretty well. As long as VU gets some Starcraft money every month Blizzard doesn't have to figure out how to make lightning strike twice in the same place.

Bushido
06-08-2005, 09:32 PM
Blizzard doesn't have to figure out how to make lightning strike twice in the same place.

hahaha no kidding.

Nimos
06-09-2005, 07:05 AM
"While China has no laws to deal with the theft of virtual property, South Korea has a section of its police force that investigates in-game crime."



Do they have (for the ones found guilty) ...virtual prisons ? how about virtual courts ?