Resistance: Fall of Man Screenshots

[JamieSI]

Strategy Informer (http://www.strategyinformer.com/) 7 new screenshots for Resistance: Fall of Man up for show on their website. The title is going to be released on the Playstation 3 in 2007.

http://images.strategyinformer.com/screenshot/00171429.jpg

You can see the rest here (http://www.strategyinformer.com/ps3/resistancefallofman/screenshots.html).

[soco]

call me a hater, but i still don't see the reason for all the hype about this game, except that it's the only decent shooter that'll be at launch for the PS3. i've watched the trailers and what not, but the only thing that really stood out was how much it looks like games released on teh 360 earlier this year. the one exception being the physics.

[drakkarim]

pictures look nice, but something about alien soldiers running around tarzan style (lack of clothes/armor) just doesn't do it for me.

[bone_matrix]

The title is going to be released on the Playstation 3 in 2007.

WTF? Did this get pushed back and no longer a launch title, or did someone mess up here?

If its really not a launch title, thats going to hurt.

edit: Says Nov. 17th on the IGN website. Must just be a typo...

[JazGalaxy]

I was looking at the thumbs and thought the game looked pretty good but as soon as I started clicking on things I was a little blown away by how poor they look as a display of the supposed power of the PS3. The visuals are no better than Perfect Dark.

With the exception of Lair, I have not seen anything on the PS3 that makes me think it has a graphical leg up on anything, and as far as gameplay goes, I have not seen one game that makes me think PS3 is offering anything better than what's already available on PS2.

[Codicier]

I was looking at the thumbs and thought the game looked pretty good but as soon as I started clicking on things I was a little blown away by how poor they look as a display of the supposed power of the PS3. The visuals are no better than Perfect Dark.

With the exception of Lair, I have not seen anything on the PS3 that makes me think it has a graphical leg up on anything, and as far as gameplay goes, I have not seen one game that makes me think PS3 is offering anything better than what's already available on PS2.

Make that two for me. Lair and White Knight.

.....it's still to expensive though. :P

[Kelegacy]

I was looking at the thumbs and thought the game looked pretty good but as soon as I started clicking on things I was a little blown away by how poor they look as a display of the supposed power of the PS3. The visuals are no better than Perfect Dark.

With the exception of Lair, I have not seen anything on the PS3 that makes me think it has a graphical leg up on anything, and as far as gameplay goes, I have not seen one game that makes me think PS3 is offering anything better than what's already available on PS2.
Kidding, right? Perfect Dark looked like shit. Resistance definitely has it beat.

And if you are arguing gameplay, what does the 360 have that isn't already available on the Xbox or PS2? The PS3 and 360 are just graphical upgrades, so gameplay-wise very little will change.

[Borys]

Naysayers can go and watch Motorstorm trailer. That game is UNIQUE.

[Yeti2005]

I think Resistence looks pretty good. It's not jaw dropping by any means but Insomnia typically makes a good game so I faith that it would be fun. If I didn't already own a 360 and I had $560 to blow during the holiday season then I'd pick it up. I think Resistence will be the killer app for the PS3 launch although I'm curious how CoD3 will stack against it.

[bapenguin]

Naysayers can go and watch Motorstorm trailer. That game is UNIQUE.

Yeah I can't wait to see that game in person.

[Yeti2005]

Naysayers can go and watch Motorstorm trailer. That game is UNIQUE.

I just watched a video (http://www.playsyde.com/stream_3076_en.html) of the gameplay on Playsyde. It reminded me of Rallisport with dune buggies. I didn't see anything really unique about it but it did look nice.

[TrackZero]

Man, those Strogg sure do look nifty running on the PS3....;)

I've got to say, seeing this game in motion is completely different than screenshots (which I've also been saying about the 360 screenshots). With out a doubt it looks fantastic. But the footage I've seen of the gameplay is what doesn't interest me. Even as an FPS, I found it hard to see where I was firing (whether due to the projectiles used, the reticle or the gun prehaps taking up too much of the screen, beats me), that and the AI didn't impress. But those are both issues that may be cleaned up before release, so we'll have to wait and see.

[Plays4Pants]

Kidding, right? Perfect Dark looked like shit. Resistance definitely has it beat.

And if you are arguing gameplay, what does the 360 have that isn't already available on the Xbox or PS2? The PS3 and 360 are just graphical upgrades, so gameplay-wise very little will change.

yes, but the graphical upgrades are suppose to yield gameplay differences....due to more potential. THe only gameplay result i've seen is "more bad guys!"...which doesn't impress me at all and bores me. The problem now lies on the fact that we're using the graphical upgrades to do stupid shit like particles and neato effects...and pointless physics.

after looking at this game and the gow e3 preview. it's obvious i'm going wii. There's nothing here. If i want to see amazing effects i'll go see a movie.

[Telefrog]

I'll agree with the prevailing sentiment here. The game looks good so far, but there's nothing that makes me poop a brick or blind me in fantastical cell-powered pixie graphics fairy goodness. I think it's better than Perfect Dark, but it looks really similar to Quake 4. It's certainly not $600 good.

[Ph00p]

wow! Thats amazing! Grey in 1080p never looked so ummm DULL, fuck did the guys forget that there are more colour palettes than just fucking grey hues and shit?

I also don't get the hype about this game, 22 gigs of GREY is all I've seen so far, that and a run of the mil ho-hum fps.

[disc]

You do know that the cheaper PS3 is the perfect choice now?

[bapenguin]

Everything I've heard from people that have PLAYED this game has been positive. I think Sony/Insomniac has a surefire hit on their hands.

[Guy Mariano]

Kidding, right? Perfect Dark looked like shit. Resistance definitely has it beat.

And if you are arguing gameplay, what does the 360 have that isn't already available on the Xbox or PS2? The PS3 and 360 are just graphical upgrades, so gameplay-wise very little will change.


QFT. If you don't like that route get zero graphics upgrade and a different input device with Wii.

[TrackZero]

Everything I've heard from people that have PLAYED this game has been positive. I think Sony/Insomniac has a surefire hit on their hands.

Yeah, it didn't look like a bad title. I've just yet to see anything in the footage to wow me, beyond the graphics.

[AntB]

Am I the only one that thinks this game looks like shit?
The Textures are incredibly low res and the LOD kicks in very early.
BTW, the screenshots on that website, are VERY low resolution. What is that? 640x480!? That's why the textures look OK. Put them into HD resolution. It looks like utter shit.

Look at the screenshots they have at VE3d.

http://ve3d.ign.com/articles/735/735608p1.html

I don't think you guys have seen these, and if you have, I don't understand what you find appealing, graphically, about this game.

If that's Sony's NEXT GENERATION 1080p. I don't want any part of it. Looks like a beefed up Quake 3.

[AntB]

http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v479/AntTripz/untitled.jpg

FEH. I don't understand what the hype is all about.

Is this supposed to be PS3's #1 game? Showing off the graphical power of the PS3?

[Lunar Blue]

Naysayers can go and watch Motorstorm trailer. That game is UNIQUE.

Yeah, i'm sorry to burst your bubble but FlatOut did it better already. Two years ago.

[theguido]

I guess I should have predicted such responses.

This game won't cause me to buy a PS3 but when I do I'll be interested in this one.

[KidCactus]

Is this supposed to be PS3's #1 game? Showing off the graphical power of the PS3?
And what kinda shitty example of a screenshot did you find? :rolleyes:

[Borys]

Yeah, i'm sorry to burst your bubble but FlatOut did it better already. Two years ago.

I finished FlatOut on my PC at ubergraphics settings and it looked nothing like Motorstorm.

The minigames were really fun, though.

[Kelegacy]

http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v479/AntTripz/untitled.jpg

FEH. I don't understand what the hype is all about.

Is this supposed to be PS3's #1 game? Showing off the graphical power of the PS3?
Very bad example of a screenshot.

[AntB]

That's a crop of a full resolution screenshot from VE3d. All of them look like that. There are no high resolution textures in this game. Everything is blurry as hell. If you haven't looked at the full resolution screenshots, I suggest you do.

[fatefodder]

I hope that those full resolution shots aren't representative of the final product--I agree that they are rather bland in the texturing department.

Regardless, between the solid gameplay videos and extensive physics in the gameplay videos I've seen, this is a solid title.

I would agree that it is not $600 solid, but I can see anyone who picks up a PS3 picking up Resistance: Fall of Man as well.

[greenapple]

That's a crop of a full resolution screenshot from VE3d. All of them look like that. There are no high resolution textures in this game. Everything is blurry as hell. If you haven't looked at the full resolution screenshots, I suggest you do.

No Hi-res textures? You mean like those that can be found on THESE full resolution screenshots on VE3d?

shot 1 (http://mediaviewer.ign.com/ignMediaPage.jsp?media_id=3935795&article_id=734340&channel_id=261&page_title=Resistance:+Fall+of+Man+PS3+Screenshot&adString=network%3Dign%26sitev%3Dve3d%26pagetype%3 Dmediaimgfat&return_url=http%3A%2F%2Fve3d.ign.com%2Farticles%2F 734%2F734340p1.html)

shot 2 (http://mediaviewer.ign.com/ignMediaPage.jsp?media_id=3935796&article_id=734340&channel_id=261&page_title=Resistance:+Fall+of+Man+PS3+Screenshot&adString=network%3Dign%26sitev%3Dve3d%26pagetype%3 Dmediaimgfat&return_url=http%3A%2F%2Fve3d.ign.com%2Farticles%2F 734%2F734340p1.html)

I think we found one of those sneeky viral marketeers, seriously.

Whether you think the game looks good or not is your own opinion, but posting BS screenshots is deceptive.

[AntB]

BULLSHIT screenshots? What I doctored them or something to make your game look worse? I took a screenshot posted on VE3d and cropped a part of showing clearly what i was talking about.

The game DOES not LOD very well. Well, heres some 411 for you. The 5 shots posted on VE3d, which you appearantly didn't look at, are MORE recent than the two shots you just posted. Also, the 2 shots you posted were some of the very first of the game, so they could have been spruced up for marketing purposes.

[Phhhh]

so... you're judging the game based on screenshots that are super blown up.

somehow I don't think the game runs at 2880p

[gspot]

No Hi-res textures? You mean like those that can be found on THESE full resolution screenshots on VE3d?

shot 1 (http://mediaviewer.ign.com/ignMediaPage.jsp?media_id=3935795&article_id=734340&channel_id=261&page_title=Resistance:+Fall+of+Man+PS3+Screenshot&adString=network%3Dign%26sitev%3Dve3d%26pagetype%3 Dmediaimgfat&return_url=http%3A%2F%2Fve3d.ign.com%2Farticles%2F 734%2F734340p1.html)

shot 2 (http://mediaviewer.ign.com/ignMediaPage.jsp?media_id=3935796&article_id=734340&channel_id=261&page_title=Resistance:+Fall+of+Man+PS3+Screenshot&adString=network%3Dign%26sitev%3Dve3d%26pagetype%3 Dmediaimgfat&return_url=http%3A%2F%2Fve3d.ign.com%2Farticles%2F 734%2F734340p1.html)

I think we found one of those sneeky viral marketeers, seriously.

Whether you think the game looks good or not is your own opinion, but posting BS screenshots is deceptive.
I am more inclined to believe you are the viral marketer after vieiwng the screen shots. You are posting some high res stuff while nothing else looks close to it. Game looks very okay. If it's trying for graphics or art, it loses. We shall see how the gameplay turns out though.

[greenapple]

BULLSHIT screenshots? What I doctored them or something to make your game look worse? I took a screenshot posted on VE3d and cropped a part of showing clearly what i was talking about.

The game DOES not LOD very well. Well, heres some 411 for you. The 5 shots posted on VE3d, which you appearantly didn't look at, are MORE recent than the two shots you just posted. Also, the 2 shots you posted were some of the very first of the game, so they could have been spruced up for marketing purposes.

Unlike you, I don't bother to put my own spin on things.

Please link your screenshots, as I did, so that people can judge for themselves, in context. Rather than presenting us with your own edited versions of the shots.

[greenapple]

I am more inclined to believe you are the viral marketer after vieiwng the screen shots. You are posting some high res stuff while nothing else looks close to it. Game looks very okay. If it's trying for graphics or art, it loses. We shall see how the gameplay turns out though.

As I said, everyone is free to make their own call on whether the game looks good or not.

I'm not posting anything- I'm linking to material posted on the specific website Antz said his "shot" came from.

What's BS about Antz post is, instead of linking to the purported shots, he crops them himself. The shot Antz released, is NOT any shot released by the developers.

[The Iron Weasel]

Kidding, right? Perfect Dark looked like shit. Resistance definitely has it beat.

And if you are arguing gameplay, what does the 360 have that isn't already available on the Xbox or PS2? The PS3 and 360 are just graphical upgrades, so gameplay-wise very little will change.

I thought PDZ was a good looking game.

[bitwise]

http://ve3d.ign.com/articles/735/735608p1.html

Wow. That's.... terrible. Are those really going to be the textures used at the game's launch? Yuck.

[JazGalaxy]

No Hi-res textures? You mean like those that can be found on THESE full resolution screenshots on VE3d?

shot 1 (http://mediaviewer.ign.com/ignMediaPage.jsp?media_id=3935795&article_id=734340&channel_id=261&page_title=Resistance:+Fall+of+Man+PS3+Screenshot&adString=network%3Dign%26sitev%3Dve3d%26pagetype%3 Dmediaimgfat&return_url=http%3A%2F%2Fve3d.ign.com%2Farticles%2F 734%2F734340p1.html)

shot 2 (http://mediaviewer.ign.com/ignMediaPage.jsp?media_id=3935796&article_id=734340&channel_id=261&page_title=Resistance:+Fall+of+Man+PS3+Screenshot&adString=network%3Dign%26sitev%3Dve3d%26pagetype%3 Dmediaimgfat&return_url=http%3A%2F%2Fve3d.ign.com%2Farticles%2F 734%2F734340p1.html)

I think we found one of those sneeky viral marketeers, seriously.

Whether you think the game looks good or not is your own opinion, but posting BS screenshots is deceptive.

I like how you just decide that a nothing but the best screenshots are "BS" Screenshots. Interesting how the screenshot you call BS is the one that looks like actual gameplay whereas the shots you call proof are from camera angles and instances that the gamer will probably never actually see...

[AntB]

As I said, everyone is free to make their own call on whether the game looks good or not.

I'm not posting anything- I'm linking to material posted on the specific website Antz said his "shot" came from.

What's BS about Antz post is, instead of linking to the purported shots, he crops them himself. The shot Antz released, is NOT any shot released by the developers.

LOL. I didn't visually edit the screenshot. I just cropped it. Idiot. You can go look at the screenshots yourself instead of spewing your nonsense. I gave the link in a previous post.

[51|RandoM]

You do know that the cheaper PS3 is the perfect choice now?

I think everybody knows it, but anybody with a 360 seems to have trouble saying it.

[JazGalaxy]

I think everybody knows it, but anybody with a 360 seems to have trouble saying it.

HAHAHAHAHAHA!

That's hilarious. The PS3 isn't going to have anything even remotely interesting as an exclusive until 2007 and not SERIUOUSLY anything until Christmas 2007.

Did you look at the Japanese Launch list? It's the most laughable thing I've seen in a very long time. Unless Majong goes up against Metroid and Zelda these days...

[Phhhh]

I want to say this again since no one listens to reason on this board. Or people just ignore me. If you view them at the correct size the game looks fine, in fact I think it looks pretty freaking good. Resize the image to 720p or 1080p.

[TheEpicOfTyler]

http://ve3d.ign.com/articles/735/735608p1.html

Are you fucking kidding me? Those are blown way up and full of jpeg artifacting, that is NOT what the game looks like. If you can't see that you're either unknowing of image compression or an idiot.

Compare those to the HD trailers available and then shut the fuck up.

[TheChosenOne23]

thanks for the shots

[Borys]

Wow, AntTripz is the new Reanimated.

[JazGalaxy]

Are you fucking kidding me? Those are blown way up and full of jpeg artifacting, that is NOT what the game looks like. If you can't see that you're either unknowing of image compression or an idiot.

Compare those to the HD trailers available and then shut the fuck up.

Trust me. Nobody is counting the compression when we say the images look unimpressive.

[TheEpicOfTyler]

Trust me. Nobody is counting the compression when we say the images look unimpressive.

Then what exactly are you counting? Those images are blown up to 2880, the ps3 does 1080. Any image stretched that much looks like shit, resize one of those images down to 1080 and I bet it will look about as good as the normal screenshots (except the extra image compression).