PDA

View Full Version : Electronic Arts Purchase of D.I.C.E. Confirmed


fitbabits
03-17-2006, 08:24 AM
Thanks to Gamasutra (http://www.gamasutra.com) for the news (http://www.gamasutra.com/php-bin/news_index.php?story=8560).

Officials from giant publisher Electronic Arts have announced that the company has finally completed its acquisition of Digital Illusions CE (aka DICE), the Swedish-headquartered developers of the popular Battlefield series, following a long-running control battle with other major shareholders.

Electronic Arts will pay 67.50 Swedish Kroner per share, or $8.80, in cash for the developer. This amount represents a 30 percent premium over DICE’s closing price as of March 16th, with Electronic Arts holding warrants which entitle it to purchase an additional 2.3 million shares, beyond the current 68 percent stake it recently gained.

The company had considerable trouble gaining a stake greater than 50 percent after initial 2004 takeover attempts. At first, EA was forced to waive a number of the conditions of its offer, following considerable DICE stockholder resistance to the purchase, and despite the full backing of the DICE board, but has gradually accumulated the balance of the shares over time.

After intense negotiations, Electronic Arts finally gained a controlling stake in January 2005, and now owns roughly 74 percent of the outstanding capital and votes in DICE.

In fact, there had already been close collaboration between EA and DICE before this final announcement, with the company announcing that it has announced that it had licensed the right to develop the PSP, Xbox and PS2 versions of the untitled new game to Electronic Arts' UK studio in Chertsey, taking advantage of its majority shareholder's large studio system.
BORG-tastic.

Heretic Machine
03-17-2006, 08:32 AM
Should I care? DICE has made two of the worst, and most overrated shooters in the industry. Not only that, but they made a deal with the devil (EA), which most people seem to completly ignore. Trash EA all you want, but forking over more and more cash is just feeding the beast.

Anyhow, good ridance...

Dr Quincy
03-17-2006, 08:38 AM
Is he talking about Codename Eagle? If so what's the second? Perigon?

Heretic Machine
03-17-2006, 08:59 AM
Is he talking about Codename Eagle? If so what's the second? Perigon?

1. BF: 1942
2. BF2

Dag-Sabot
03-17-2006, 09:16 AM
Nothing says: "Were going down hill fast" like getting bought by EA; Everything they touch turns in to crap.

Shodan2020
03-17-2006, 09:22 AM
Behold! The shitty shooter!

Hijinx
03-17-2006, 09:23 AM
1. BF: 1942
2. BF2

Since games are a personal form of entertainment, I am very curious why you feel BF1942 and BF2 are the worst shooters ever made?

Is it April 1st?

Dr Quincy
03-17-2006, 09:37 AM
Is it April 1st?

Only possibility.

Knite
03-17-2006, 09:51 AM
Since games are a personal form of entertainment, I am very curious why you feel BF1942 and BF2 are the worst shooters ever made?



I'd like to hear this too, since I felt BF1942 was one of the best.
(not really feel that way about BF2, but it's still far from the worst.)

Heretic Machine
03-17-2006, 09:56 AM
Since games are a personal form of entertainment, I am very curious why you feel BF1942 and BF2 are the worst shooters ever made?

Did I say they were the worst shooters ever made? I'm pretty sure I said they are TWO OF the worst shooters ever made, meaning I rank them low. Their control sucks, the gameplay is buggy, vehicles are unresponsive... I could go on. People ignore all of these things, and proclaim them to be two of the best multiplayer online shooters, and I just don't get it.

Dag-Sabot
03-17-2006, 10:57 AM
I think the BF series was neither good nor bad. What IS bad is that EA publishes unfinished betas that they constantly [attempt] patching to lesser and lesser degrees of success. It never fails to amaze the bugs that surface after every single patch they isssue.

KasterTroy
03-17-2006, 11:41 AM
DICE has made some of my favorite racing games Rallisport 1 and 2, which also have some of the best graphics on the xbox IMO.

balamoor
03-17-2006, 02:02 PM
I hate EA. I said it before and I'll say it again I will never forgive them for what they did to Westwood, Battletech 3025 and Earth and Beyond.

May they smoke a turd in hell.

Megalith
03-17-2006, 02:30 PM
DICE is only one of the most talented yet underrated developers next to Starbreeze.

TheHulk
03-17-2006, 02:34 PM
Resistance if futile, baby! Who's next???

Heretic Machine
03-17-2006, 02:51 PM
DICE is only one of the most talented yet underrated developers next to Starbreeze.

How are they underrated? They made one of the most popular FPS franchises EVER.

bone4ahead
03-17-2006, 03:31 PM
Did I say they were the worst shooters ever made? I'm pretty sure I said they are TWO OF the worst shooters ever made, meaning I rank them low. Their control sucks, the gameplay is buggy, vehicles are unresponsive... I could go on. People ignore all of these things, and proclaim them to be two of the best multiplayer online shooters, and I just don't get it.

All the things you say is true, however BF is still awesome. It's worth it, even with all the crap. It's got some of the most epic and grand gameplay in FPS history. I rank BattleField 1942 has my favorite PC fps. .. and also the most buggy.

Acleacius
03-17-2006, 04:35 PM
This also enables EA to kill Mafia which seems to ahve been a target, to prevent any competition to Godfather.
Mafia had very much potiential and was considering at the time was a indie title in 2002, which came out near to GTA3, yet had a much better story, much better developed characters, better graphics and most important no constantling respaning charcaters. :p
Yet it was hampered by obviously Developer Ego problems, most specificly no Save anytime features, no Multiplayer features and basicly slapping the Mod community in the face with a swift kick to the jewels. :eek:

Now if the Godfather fails to do anything other than try to mimick Mafia and GTA we should take up a collection and send code name 47 to take out the trash. :cool: